ARTivism Contest 2026: place activist art in public, up to US$300 per winner. Sign up to compete →
Find your country and activity to compare local rules with enforcement for casual campaign use.
AI-assisted draft, updated with local experience. Open an entry for its sources and rating basis. About this guide
32 entries · 2 city-specific entries
Country guidance stays alongside matching local entries.
Local guidance is missing for this search. Any country entries below are background only. Add local guidance.
Both the physical poster installer and the organizing company or event promoter can be fined under state environmental protection laws.
Enforcement: moderate to high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed says both the person putting up a poster and its organiser can be fined. It identifies no state provision.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
State EPA Acts & Summary Offences Acts. Source link needed.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Treated as bill-posting or minor property defacement; active abatement carried out by public transport authorities.
Enforcement: moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Summary Offences Act / Municipal Ordinances. Source link needed.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Can be treated as defacing public property; enforcement policies vary widely by local council jurisdiction.
Enforcement: low to moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Local Council By-laws / Summary Offences. Source link needed.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Up to $24,000 AUD fine and 2 years imprisonment. Carrying spray cans in public without a demonstrated lawful excuse is an offense.
Enforcement: very high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed lists a fine up to AUD 24,000 and two years’ imprisonment without identifying the state or provision. These claims need checking.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
State Graffiti Vandalism Acts. Source link needed.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Postal delivery is legal. Hand-delivery to letterboxes marked 'No Junk Mail' violates industry codes and environmental littering laws.
Enforcement: moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Distribution Standards Code / Litter Laws. Source link needed.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Considered unauthorized commercial/public space usage (Sondernutzung). Substantial municipal fines apply.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions municipal fines without amounts or local sources.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Strassen- und Wegegesetz / OWiG
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Classified as illegal surface alteration. Public transport authorities actively pursue legal cost recovery from slap-taggers.
Enforcement: moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions recovery of removal costs by transport authorities. No local outcomes have been supplied.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Allowed on public footpaths if temporary and non-damaging; banned if causing political disturbance or placed on historic monuments.
Enforcement: low. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Strassenreinigung / Ordnungsamt local bylaws. Source link needed.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Section 303 covers unlawful property damage and unauthorized changes to appearance that are more than insignificant and more than temporary.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions criminal proceedings and civil recovery of removal costs. No local outcomes have been supplied.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Source correction: Corrected § 303b (computer sabotage) to § 303 (property damage). Enforcement and outcomes still need local evidence.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
The national property-damage provision is § 303. The seed also names designated painting walls in Berlin; the permission, boundaries and current conditions at each wall still need checking.
Enforcement: moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Source correction: Corrected the statute. The seed’s claim about permission at Mauerpark has not been verified.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Banned if mailbox displays 'Bitte keine Werbung' (No Advertising). Placing flyers in opted-out boxes violates civil personality rights.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) § 823
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Strict enforcement by local public health & safety bureaus. Unauthorized posting on utility poles incurs steep administrative fines.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions administrative fines without amounts or a specific provision.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Outdoor Advertisement Control Law (屋外広告物法)
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Explicitly prohibited under minor offense law (affixing notices on private or public structures without owner consent).
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Minor Offense Act (軽犯罪法) Art. 1(33)
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Placing markings or objects on roads/sidewalks without explicit police authorization violates public road traffic laws.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Road Traffic Act (道路交通法) Art. 77
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
High police prosecution rate, widespread CCTV surveillance, mandatory financial restitution, and a permanent criminal record.
Enforcement: extremely high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions prosecution, restitution and a criminal record. Its claims about frequency and mandatory outcomes are unverified.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Penal Code Art. 261 / Minor Offense Act
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Door-to-door posting (posutingu) into residential mailboxes can trigger criminal trespass charges if marked 'No Flyers'.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions possible trespass charges for residential delivery. No local outcomes have been supplied.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Penal Code Art. 130 (Criminal Trespass)
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Strict zero-tolerance enforcement. Fines up to $2,000 SGD, imprisonment, or corrective work orders.
Enforcement: extremely high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed lists fines up to SGD 2,000, imprisonment or corrective work orders. The applicable provisions and conditions need checking.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Vandalism Act (Cap 341) / Infrastructure Protection Act
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Treated as illegal defacement/vandalism; active monitoring via CCTV networks and public reporting mobile applications.
Enforcement: extremely high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Treated as public property defacement; subject to strict financial penalties and potential arrest.
Enforcement: extremely high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions financial penalties and possible arrest. No local outcomes have been supplied.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Mandatory 3 to 8 strokes of the cane, up to $2,000 SGD fine, and up to 3 years imprisonment. Zero tolerance.
Enforcement: maximum enforcement. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed lists caning, fines up to SGD 2,000 and imprisonment up to three years. Its claim that caning is mandatory needs checking against the statutory exceptions and circumstances.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Hand distribution in public places or HDB/condo mailbox drops requires explicit regulatory licenses or building management permits.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Public Order Act / NEA Regulations
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Fixed Penalty Notices (£80–£150) or court fines up to £2,500. Banned on public street furniture without local council consent.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed lists £80–£150 fixed penalties and court fines up to £2,500. The applicable jurisdiction, provision and current amounts need checking.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s224
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Classified as fly-posting or minor property damage; council wardens issue immediate Fixed Penalty Notices.
Enforcement: moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Technically illegal if it causes expense or effort to remove, though rarely prosecuted for non-disruptive sidewalk art.
Enforcement: low. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Punishable by fines up to £5,000 or up to 10 years imprisonment for severe damage (>£5,000). Legal on designated council walls.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed lists fines up to £5,000 and imprisonment up to 10 years for severe damage. These are unreviewed penalty claims, not typical outcomes.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
England and Wales guidance lists exemptions for distribution on behalf of a charity, for political purposes, or for religion or other beliefs. This source does not establish the rules across the whole UK or for every delivery method.
Enforcement: moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
Leaflet distribution guidance (England and Wales)
Source correction: Added the omitted exemptions and limited the source’s scope to England and Wales. Posted mail, door delivery and hand distribution still need separate guidance.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Permitted on designated public forum bulletin boards. First Amendment protects content, not physical placement without permit.
Enforcement: Low for casual use. Covers casual campaign postering and wheatpasting. A contributor with years of US activist experience reports no fines or arrests for themselves or fellow participants. Large commercial posting operations are a separate scale of activity.
United States · Reported October 8, 2026
A contributor describes years of participation in US activist movements that made extensive use of stickers and wheatpaste.
Outcome: They report no fines or arrests for themselves or fellow participants during that experience.
Contributor account
Municipal Codes (Time/Place/Manner Framework)
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Local permission and property-damage rules depend on the city and the surface carrying the sticker.
Enforcement: Low for casual use. Covers casual campaign stickering. A contributor with years of US activist experience reports no fines or arrests for themselves or fellow participants. Sustained graffiti tagging is assessed separately.
United States · Reported October 8, 2026
The same contributor account covers campaign stickering: years of participation in US activist movements using stickers and wheatpaste.
Outcome: They report no fines or arrests for themselves or fellow participants during that experience.
Contributor account
Municipal Vandalism & Property Damage Laws. Source link needed.
Source correction: Removed the unsupported claim of higher fines on particular surfaces. Added a separate enforcement rating for casual campaign use.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Section 10-117(a) requires express permission from the property owner or operator to attach stickers or decals.
Enforcement: Low for casual use. Applies the casual campaign baseline from the US entry. The contributor describes the arrests discussed in the NY1 report as cases involving sticker artists. Those cases concern a different intensity of activity; sticker removal is also distinct from enforcement against people.
NY1: sticker art and cleanup in NYC (October 6, 2026)
Section 10-117 provides for civil and criminal penalties and sticker-removal costs.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
NYC Administrative Code § 10-117
Source correction: Replaced the unsupported fine range and district-doubling claim with the permission rule in § 10-117. Enforcement is rated separately for casual campaign use.
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Temporary water-soluble chalk on public sidewalks is protected in several circuit courts, but banned on transit systems and private property.
Enforcement: low to moderate. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
No specific penalties or reported outcomes have been added to this entry.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
9th Cir. Precedent / Local Defacement Ordinances
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Felony thresholds apply if damage exceeds dollar limits ($250–$1,500). Legal on private property with owner consent or designated legal walls.
Enforcement: high. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed mentions felony damage thresholds of $250–$1,500 without identifying the states or provisions. These amounts need checking locally.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
State Penal Codes (Criminal Mischief / Vandalism)
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
Inserting non-stamped items into USPS mailboxes is a federal offense. Doorstep/porch drop is legal unless 'No Solicitation' is posted.
Enforcement: high for mailboxes; low for doorstep delivery. Initial draft estimate. Local experience can help refine this rating and the scale of activity it covers.
The seed describes unstamped mailbox delivery as a federal offense. It supplies no observed outcomes.
Awaiting local accounts. Share what happened in your area.
18 U.S.C. § 1725 (Mailbox Restriction Law)
AI-assisted seed · 2026-09-28 · Full review pending · Revision 1.0.2
The 32 entries began as an AI-assisted draft dated September 28, 2026. That is a source date, not a verification date. Legal summaries, penalties and enforcement estimates still need review. Check each source’s jurisdiction and method: delivering a leaflet, handing it out and attaching it to a surface can involve different rules.
Enforcement ratings describe practical experience for casual campaign activity: putting up stickers or posters, chalking a message or handing out leaflets. The amount, frequency and method matter. Sustained graffiti tagging and large commercial posting operations are assessed separately. Removing material is different from warning, fining or arresting a person.
Ratings draw on local experience and reporting, with the basis stated in each entry. They are qualitative judgments about the activity and scale described there. Statutory penalties appear separately under written consequences.
Correct a rule, add a missing place, or describe an encounter and its outcome. Include the area, approximate date and activity. Firsthand experience is welcome without an official source.
Suggestions go to the TraceReach team for review before publication. Differing accounts can appear together. Email is optional and used only to follow up. Leave out names, exact addresses and other identifying details.
The guide informs your choices. It does not decide whether you can record a Drop or treat a legal restriction as a judgment about your cause.
Add local guidance